Fighting To Keep Families Together
Serving Clients Throughout Arizona, California, and New York
California Board of Registered Nursing Attorney
If you have received a letter from the California Board of Registered Nursing (“BRN”), learned that a complaint has been filed against your nursing license, or discovered that your application for licensure is under investigation, you may feel alarmed and wonder what happens next.
A BRN investigation can place your nursing license, professional reputation, and livelihood at risk. However, the opening of an investigation does not mean that you committed unprofessional conduct or that discipline is inevitable. Depending on the evidence, the BRN may close the complaint without merit, close it with merit but without formal discipline, issue a citation and fine, offer a stipulated settlement, or initiate formal disciplinary proceedings.
At Lavy Law, we represent California registered nurses and nursing applicants during BRN investigations, investigator interviews, settlement negotiations, administrative hearings, petitions for reconsideration, and judicial-review proceedings. We work to protect both your ability to practice and the professional reputation you have spent years building.
What Is the California Board of Registered Nursing?
The California Board of Registered Nursing is the state agency responsible for regulating the practice of registered nursing in California. It licenses registered nurses, certifies advanced-practice nurses, approves nursing education programs, investigates complaints, and imposes discipline when it finds a violation of the Nursing Practice Act.
The BRN is a nine-member Board composed of five registered nurses and four public members. The five nursing members include two direct-patient-care nurses, an advanced-practice nurse, a nurse administrator, and a nurse educator.
The BRN’s authority is derived primarily from the California Nursing Practice Act, located in Business and Professions Code §§ 2700 through 2838.4, and the Board’s regulations in Title 16 of the California Code of Regulations. California Board of Registered Nursing: Nursing Practice Act.
Which Professionals Does the California BRN Regulate?
The California Board of Registered Nursing regulates:
- Registered Nurses;
- Nurse Practitioners;
- Certified Nurse-Midwives;
- Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists;
- Clinical Nurse Specialists;
- Public Health Nurses;
- Psychiatric/Mental Health Nurses;
- advanced-practice furnishing authority;
- registered nursing education programs; and
- applicants seeking an RN license or advanced-practice certification.
Licensed vocational nurses are regulated by the California Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians.
What Is Unprofessional Conduct Under the California Nursing Practice Act?
California Business and Professions Code § 2761 authorizes the BRN to discipline a licensed or certified nurse, or deny an application, for specified forms of misconduct. There is not one broad statutory definition of “unprofessional conduct.” Instead, the conduct that may support discipline is identified primarily in California Business and Professions Code § 2761(a), Title 16, California Code of Regulations § 1441, and Standards of Competent Performance in 16 CCR § 1443.5.
Depending on the circumstances, allegations may involve:
- incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out nursing functions;
- medication errors or unsafe medication administration;
- inadequate assessment or monitoring of a patient;
- failure to follow a provider’s order;
- inaccurate, incomplete, or falsified documentation;
- practicing beyond the nurse’s competence or authorized scope;
- excessive force, mistreatment, or abuse of a patient;
- patient neglect or abandonment;
- impairment by alcohol, drugs, or a mental or physical condition;
- boundary violations or sexual misconduct;
- breach of patient confidentiality;
- criminal conduct substantially related to nursing practice;
- discipline imposed by another state or licensing agency;
- fraud or deceit in obtaining or attempting to obtain a license;
- providing false or misleading information during a BRN investigation.
California regulations also identify conduct that may constitute unprofessional conduct, including failing to meet standards of competent performance, failing to safeguard patients, falsifying records, abandoning a patient assignment, and failing to maintain appropriate professional boundaries.
Not every mistake or adverse patient outcome proves incompetence, gross negligence, or unprofessional conduct. The circumstances matter, including the nurse’s assignment, training, workload, access to the electronic medical record, facility procedures, supervisory directions, staffing conditions, documentation, and the actions of other healthcare professionals.
Gross negligence generally requires an extreme departure from the applicable standard of care. Incompetence generally concerns a lack of knowledge or skill in performing professional nursing obligations. These are different from an ordinary mistake or an unfavorable patient outcome.
What Happens During a California Board of Registered Nursing Case?
Step 1: The BRN Receives a Complaint, Report, or Licensing Concern
A complaint may come from a patient, family member, employer, coworker, healthcare facility, law-enforcement agency, another licensing board, or other source. The BRN may also receive information through fingerprint results, criminal-court records, mandatory reports, or discipline imposed in another state.
The BRN may investigate an applicant when information disclosed in—or omitted from—a licensing application raises questions about the applicant’s qualifications, honesty, conduct, education, criminal history, or professional credentials.
For example, an applicant investigation may arise from:
- a criminal conviction;
- prior discipline against another professional license;
- an allegation of application fraud or misrepresentation;
- discrepancies in nursing education or credentialing documents;
- an irregularity involving examination eligibility; or
- information received from another state’s nursing board.
After receiving a complaint, BRN staff determine whether the allegations fall within the Board’s jurisdiction. A nonjurisdictional complaint may be closed or referred to another agency. A matter involving nursing practice may be reviewed by a Nursing Education Consultant, while other matters may be referred to the BRN Investigation Unit or the Department of Consumer Affairs’ Division of Investigation.
A nurse should not assume that the initial written response is merely an opportunity to provide an informal explanation. Anything provided to the BRN or its investigator may become part of the investigative record and may later be used to support an Accusation.
Step 2: The Investigator Collects Evidence
The investigation may be conducted by a BRN Special Investigator or an investigator from the Department of Consumer Affairs’ Division of Investigation. Division of Investigation investigators may be sworn peace officers.
During the investigation, the investigator may:
- interview the nurse or applicant;
- interview the complainant, patient, employer, coworkers, or other witnesses;
- obtain patient medical records;
- obtain employment and personnel records;
- request policies, procedures, schedules, and audit trails;
- obtain pharmacy or controlled-substance records;
- review criminal or civil-court records;
- request a written statement;
- request an in-person or remote interview;
- obtain expert review of the nursing care; or
- gather other documentary or electronic evidence.
The investigator may ask the nurse to sign releases permitting access to employment, medical, treatment, or other confidential records. Before signing a release or participating in an interview, the nurse should understand the scope of the request, the allegations being investigated, and any possible criminal or collateral consequences.
Investigators may refer suspected criminal conduct to a district attorney or another law-enforcement agency. For that reason, an investigation involving controlled substances, patient abuse, fraud, falsified records, identity or credentialing issues, or a patient death should be approached carefully.
Step 3: The BRN Reviews the Investigation
After the investigation is completed, the investigator prepares a written report and submits it to the BRN for review. Depending on the allegations, the BRN may also obtain an opinion from a Nursing Education Consultant or outside nursing expert.
The BRN then determines whether the evidence substantiates a violation and, if so, whether the matter warrants formal disciplinary action.
Possible outcomes at this stage include:
- closure without merit;
- closure with merit but without formal disciplinary action;
- referral to the Intervention Program;
- citation and fine; or
- referral to the California Attorney General’s Office for formal disciplinary proceedings.
A complaint is considered “closed without merit” when the evidence does not substantiate a violation of the Nursing Practice Act. A complaint may be “closed with merit” when the BRN identifies a violation but determines that it does not justify formal restrictions or discipline against the license.
For less serious violations, the Executive Officer may issue a citation and fine. A nurse ordinarily has the right to challenge the citation through the applicable informal or formal appeal process.
Step 4: Accusation or Statement of Issues
If the BRN concludes that formal disciplinary action may be warranted, the matter is referred to the California Attorney General’s Office. A Deputy Attorney General reviews the evidence and may prepare an Accusation against a licensed nurse.
An Accusation is a formal legal pleading identifying the factual allegations, alleged violations of law, and discipline sought against the nurse’s license. Once filed, the Accusation becomes a public record.
When the case involves an applicant rather than an existing licensee, the formal pleading is generally called a Statement of Issues. It identifies the grounds upon which the BRN proposes to deny the application or issue a license subject to conditions.
After being served with an Accusation, a nurse generally has only 15 days to submit a Notice of Defense requesting a hearing. Failing to respond on time may waive the nurse’s right to a hearing and allow the BRN to proceed by default. A default decision normally results in revocation.
The nurse should contact an attorney immediately after receiving an Accusation or Statement of Issues.
Step 5: Discovery and Settlement Negotiations
After a Notice of Defense is filed, the nurse may obtain discovery concerning the evidence supporting the charges. California Government Code § 11507.6 permits the parties to request specified witness information, statements, reports, photographs, documents, and other evidence.
The case is prosecuted by a Deputy Attorney General on behalf of the BRN. The parties may discuss a negotiated resolution, commonly called a Stipulated Settlement and Disciplinary Order or stipulated agreement.
By entering a stipulated agreement, the nurse generally accepts specified factual or legal findings and agrees to the proposed discipline and probationary conditions. The agreement must be approved by the BRN before it becomes final.
Before accepting a stipulated agreement, it is important to consider more than whether the nurse can comply with its immediate terms. BRN discipline may affect:
- current and future employment;
- hospital privileges;
- credentialing;
- participation in insurance programs;
- licenses in other states;
- future licensing applications;
- advanced-practice certification and furnishing authority;
- professional-liability insurance;
- reporting to national disciplinary databases; and
- the nurse’s ability to practice in particular clinical settings.
California’s Recommended Guidelines for Disciplinary Orders and Conditions of Probation identify recommended penalties and probationary terms for different violations. The guidelines may be used during settlement negotiations and by an Administrative Law Judge or the BRN when determining the appropriate discipline. BRN Forms and Publications.
Step 6: Administrative Hearing
If the case cannot be resolved, it proceeds to a formal administrative hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) at the California Office of Administrative Hearings.
The administrative hearing functions much like a bench trial, although it is governed by California’s Administrative Procedure Act rather than the rules applicable in a criminal case. Both sides may:
- present documentary evidence;
- call witnesses;
- cross-examine opposing witnesses;
- present expert testimony;
- challenge the admissibility or reliability of evidence;
- make legal arguments; and
- submit written briefing.
The Deputy Attorney General presents the BRN’s case. The nurse may testify, call witnesses, present expert opinions, challenge the government’s evidence, and introduce evidence of mitigation and rehabilitation.
In a disciplinary case against an existing professional license, the BRN generally must prove the charges by clear and convincing evidence to a reasonable certainty. This standard is higher than a preponderance of the evidence but lower than proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
After the hearing, the ALJ prepares a Proposed Decision containing findings of fact, legal conclusions, and a recommended outcome.
The Proposed Decision is sent to the BRN, which makes the final administrative decision. The Board may adopt the Proposed Decision, reduce or otherwise mitigate the penalty, make limited changes, refer the matter back to an ALJ for additional evidence, or reject the Proposed Decision and decide the matter based on the administrative record.
Step 7: Reconsideration and Judicial Review
A nurse who disagrees with the BRN’s final decision may seek reconsideration under California Government Code § 11521. The deadline is short and depends on the effective date and procedural posture of the decision.
A nurse may also seek judicial review by filing a petition for a writ of administrative mandate in California Superior Court under Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5.
Judicial review is not a new administrative hearing. The Superior Court ordinarily reviews the administrative record to determine whether the BRN proceeded within its jurisdiction, provided a fair hearing, and made findings supported by the applicable evidentiary standard.
Because professional nursing licenses are considered fundamental vested rights, a Superior Court may exercise its independent judgment when reviewing the BRN’s factual findings. Even under independent-judgment review, however, the court generally
begins with the administrative record and gives a presumption of correctness to the BRN’s findings.
Reconsideration and writ proceedings involve strict deadlines, preparation of the administrative record, legal briefing, and potentially a request to stay the discipline while judicial review is pending.
What Penalties Can the California BRN Impose?
Possible outcomes include:
- Closure Without Merit. The evidence does not substantiate a violation of the Nursing Practice Act.
- Closure With Merit. The BRN identifies a violation but determines that it does not warrant formal discipline or restrictions. The complaint may remain in the Board’s file for future reference.
- Citation and Fine. The BRN may issue a citation and monetary penalty for a violation that does not warrant formal disciplinary proceedings. A citation may be contested.
- Public Reproval or Reprimand. The BRN formally identifies a violation but does not impose practice restrictions.
- Probation. The nurse may continue practicing subject to specified terms and conditions. The order is often written as a revocation that is “stayed” while the nurse successfully completes probation.
- Conditional License. An applicant may be issued an initial license subject to probation and monitoring.
- Suspension. The nurse may not practice for a specified or indefinite period.
- Revocation. The nurse’s license is revoked, and the nurse may no longer practice registered nursing or use the RN title in California.
- Voluntary Surrender. The nurse agrees to surrender the license as a resolution of the disciplinary matter.
- Denial of an Application. The BRN may deny an application for initial licensure or certification.
- Interim Suspension or Practice Restrictions. In cases involving an asserted immediate danger to the public, the BRN may seek an interim order suspending the license or restricting the nurse’s practice before the underlying disciplinary case is finally decided.
Our goal is always to resolve cases as early as possible while protecting your ability to continue practicing your profession.
What Is the BRN Intervention Program?
California’s Intervention Program is a voluntary and confidential alternative-to-discipline program for registered nurses whose ability to practice may be impaired by a substance-use disorder or mental illness.
A qualifying nurse may receive a structured rehabilitation and monitoring plan rather than public discipline. The program may require treatment, random drug testing, nurse support-group attendance, worksite monitoring, practice restrictions, and temporary removal from nursing practice.
Enrollment should not be treated as an automatic or risk-free decision. A nurse entering the program generally agrees to place the license on inactive status temporarily and to comply with an intensive monitoring plan that may last several years. Failure to comply may result in termination from the program and referral to the BRN’s Enforcement Program.
Before enrolling, a nurse should understand:
- whether the nurse is eligible;
- the immediate effect on employment;
- the expected period away from practice;
- the cost of treatment and monitoring;
- the required releases of confidential information;
- the conditions for returning to work; and
- what may happen if the nurse does not complete the program.
The Intervention Program is generally available only to individuals who already hold an unencumbered California RN license. Nursing students and individuals licensed only as vocational nurses are not eligible. California BRN Intervention Program.
Why Should I Hire an Attorney Early?
One of the most consequential mistakes a nurse or applicant can make is waiting until after an Accusation has been filed to consult an attorney.
A nurse may believe that speaking openly and informally with the investigator will quickly clear up a misunderstanding. Instead, an incomplete, poorly worded, or inaccurate statement may become evidence supporting additional allegations. An investigator may also ask questions about subjects that extend beyond the original complaint or that create possible criminal exposure.
An attorney can help protect your rights by:
- communicating with the investigator on your behalf;
- identifying the actual allegations and applicable law;
- preparing your written response;
- preparing you for an investigator interview;
- attending the interview with you;
- requesting and reviewing the BRN’s file;
- gathering favorable evidence;
- retaining an appropriate nursing expert when necessary;
- identifying factual and legal defenses;
- presenting mitigation and rehabilitation evidence;
- negotiating with the BRN or Attorney General’s Office; and
- representing you at an administrative hearing and during judicial review.
Early representation often provides the greatest opportunity to correct inaccurate information, preserve evidence, obtain favorable witness statements, and resolve the case before public charges are filed.
Why Choose Lavy Law?
California Board of Registered Nursing cases are government investigations that can threaten a nurse’s career, reputation, and financial stability. Successfully defending these cases requires more than familiarity with agency forms and administrative procedures. It requires the ability to investigate facts, evaluate medical and documentary evidence, prepare witnesses, negotiate with government attorneys, and litigate when a fair resolution cannot be reached.
At Lavy Law, our foundation is trial advocacy. Before focusing on professional-license defense, Attorney Kara Lavy served as a prosecutor and developed extensive experience litigating criminal, immigration, and administrative matters. The same skills used in the courtroom—building a factual defense, identifying inconsistencies, cross-examining witnesses, challenging government evidence, and presenting persuasive legal arguments—are brought to every nursing-license case.
Some administrative-law attorneys focus almost exclusively on negotiated resolutions and have limited trial experience. When your nursing license is at stake, you deserve an attorney who is prepared both to pursue a favorable resolution and to litigate the case before an Administrative Law Judge or Superior Court when necessary.
Whether your goal is obtaining closure during the investigation, preventing the filing of an Accusation, challenging a citation, negotiating reasonable probation terms, defending a licensure application, prevailing at an administrative hearing, or challenging the BRN’s final decision, Lavy Law is prepared to advocate for you at every stage.
Frequently Asked Questions
A BRN Investigator Contacted Me. Should I Speak With Them?
You should consult an attorney before providing a written statement or participating in an interview.
An investigator’s interview is an evidence-gathering procedure, not an informal conversation. Even truthful statements can be misunderstood, taken out of context, or used to support additional allegations.
An attorney can help determine the investigator’s concerns, review relevant records, prepare you for likely questions, attend the interview, and evaluate whether any answer could create criminal or other legal exposure.
Do I Have to Cooperate With the California BRN?
A nurse generally should not ignore a lawful BRN request. Refusing to cooperate, failing to comply with a subpoena, or providing false or misleading information may create additional problems.
That does not mean the nurse should immediately sign every release, produce every requested document, or participate in an interview without legal advice. An attorney can evaluate the BRN’s authority, the scope of the request, applicable privacy or privilege concerns, and any overlap with a criminal investigation.
Can I Obtain a Copy of the BRN’s Investigative File?
Business and Professions Code § 800(c) generally permits a licensee—or the licensee’s attorney or representative—to inspect and obtain copies of the licensee’s central file, subject to exceptions for information that may identify a confidential source.
The timing and contents of the production may depend on the status of the investigation and applicable confidentiality protections. A nurse or attorney may submit what is commonly called an “800(c) request” to the BRN.
Once an Accusation or Statement of Issues has been filed, additional discovery rights are available under the California Administrative Procedure Act.
Will I Automatically Lose My License if a Complaint Is Filed?
No. A complaint is only the beginning of the process.
The BRN may determine that it lacks jurisdiction, close the complaint without merit, close it with merit but without formal discipline, refer an eligible nurse to the Intervention Program, or issue a citation rather than pursue formal discipline.
Even if the BRN substantiates a violation, the outcome depends on the nature and severity of the conduct, the risk to the public, the nurse’s disciplinary history, evidence of rehabilitation, and other mitigating and aggravating circumstances.
Is a BRN Investigation Confidential?
Complaints and investigative records are generally confidential and are not public records while the investigation is pending.
If the BRN files an Accusation against a nurse or a Statement of Issues against an applicant, the pleading becomes a public record. Final disciplinary decisions are also public and may appear through the BRN’s online license-verification system.
Because an Accusation itself becomes public before the charges have been proven, avoiding unsupported or unnecessarily broad allegations at the investigative stage can be especially important.
Can I Continue Working While the Investigation Is Pending?
In many cases, yes. The filing of a complaint or opening of an investigation does not automatically suspend a California RN license.
However, an employer may independently place the nurse on leave, impose restrictions, or terminate employment. The BRN may also seek an Interim Suspension Order or other practice restrictions if it alleges that continued unrestricted practice would endanger the public.
What Is an Interim Suspension Order?
An Interim Suspension Order is an order temporarily suspending a nursing license—or imposing restrictions such as supervision, testing, or remedial training—before the underlying disciplinary case is finally resolved.
The BRN may seek an interim order when it alleges that permitting the nurse to continue practicing without restriction would endanger the public. Because these proceedings may move quickly and can immediately affect employment, a nurse served with an interim-order petition should contact an attorney immediately.
What Is the Difference Between an Accusation and a Statement of Issues?
An Accusation is the formal pleading used when the BRN seeks discipline against a person who already holds a license or certificate.
A Statement of Issues is generally used when the BRN seeks to deny an application or issue an initial license subject to conditions.
Both documents initiate formal administrative proceedings and may be contested through the applicable hearing process.
How Long Do I Have to Respond to an Accusation?
A nurse generally has 15 days after service of the Accusation to file a Notice of Defense requesting a hearing.
Failing to submit a timely Notice of Defense may waive the right to contest the charges and allow the BRN to enter a default decision. The BRN states that default decisions normally result in revocation.
Because the deadline is short, you should contact an attorney immediately after receiving an Accusation.
Is a Citation and Fine the Same as Formal Discipline?
A citation and fine is generally used for violations the BRN considers less serious than those warranting an Accusation and formal disciplinary proceedings.
Nevertheless, a citation should not be ignored. It may affect the nurse’s professional record and may be considered if another complaint is filed. A nurse ordinarily has the right to contest the citation through an informal conference, formal administrative appeal, or both, depending on the notice provided.
Can an Applicant Be Investigated Even Though the Applicant Has Never Practiced in California?
Yes. The BRN may investigate information arising from an application, fingerprint results, a criminal-history record, another state’s disciplinary action, a nursing school, a credentialing organization, or another source.
The BRN may deny the application, issue a conditional license, or file a Statement of Issues. However, a conviction, prior discipline, or questioned document does not necessarily require denial. The circumstances, available evidence, applicable statutory limitations, rehabilitation, and the applicant’s current qualifications must be evaluated.
What Happens When a Credentialing Organization Questions My Documents?
The BRN may investigate whether an applicant submitted false information or committed fraud or deceit in seeking licensure. The investigation may focus on educational records, transcripts, clinical hours, signatures, emails, examination documents, and the manner in which records were transmitted.
A discrepancy identified by a school or credentialing organization does not itself prove that the applicant knowingly created or submitted a fraudulent document. The applicant’s knowledge, intent, communications, and the actions of schools, agents, family members, or intermediaries may be important.
Who Prosecutes a BRN Accusation?
A Deputy Attorney General from the California Attorney General’s Office ordinarily prosecutes the Accusation on behalf of the BRN.
The Deputy Attorney General presents the government’s evidence, participates in discovery, negotiates proposed settlements, and represents the BRN during the administrative hearing.
Who Decides the Case at the Administrative Hearing?
An Administrative Law Judge from the California Office of Administrative Hearings presides over the hearing and issues a Proposed Decision.
The Proposed Decision is not automatically final. The BRN retains final decision-making authority and may adopt, modify within statutory limits, or reject the Proposed Decision.
Can I Appeal the BRN’s Final Decision?
Yes. Depending on the circumstances, a nurse may request reconsideration and may seek judicial review by filing a petition for a writ of administrative mandate in California Superior Court.
These proceedings are subject to strict deadlines. A nurse considering judicial review should consult an attorney as soon as the final decision is received.
Is a California BRN Investigation the Same as a Malpractice Case?
No. Although the same incident may give rise to both, a BRN investigation and a medical-malpractice lawsuit are separate legal proceedings.
A malpractice lawsuit is a civil action filed by a patient or the patient’s family seeking monetary damages for an injury allegedly caused by negligent medical care. A BRN investigation is an administrative licensing proceeding brought by the State to determine whether a nurse violated the Nursing Practice Act or BRN regulations.
A nurse may successfully defend a malpractice lawsuit and still face BRN discipline, or vice versa. The legal standards, evidence, parties, and potential consequences differ, so each matter requires its own defense.
Will My Nursing Liability Insurance, Such as NSO, Pay for an Attorney?
Possibly. Many professional-liability policies, including some policies offered through Nurses Service Organization (“NSO”), provide limited coverage for attorney’s fees incurred in responding to a licensing-board investigation or disciplinary proceeding..
If you carry professional-liability insurance, you should notify the carrier promptly after learning of the BRN investigation and ask whether your policy provides coverage for licensing-board defense.
At Lavy Law, we represent nurses regardless of whether insurance coverage is available. Over the years, many nurses insured through professional-liability carriers, including NSO, have retained our firm to defend them before nursing boards and other professional-licensing agencies. If you wish to seek reimbursement from your insurance carrier, we will maintain detailed time records throughout the representation and, upon conclusion of the matter, provide you with an itemized accounting of our time and fees.